The components of the Enigma machine | ![]() Tony Sale's Codes and Ciphers |
This is Page 2 of Tony Sale's sequence of pages on the Enigma, explaining the components of the Enigma machine and how it was adapted for military use.
Enigma rotors (or wheels)
Before seeing how the Enigma machine was constructed you should see the rotors or wheels which embodied the alphabetic substitutions.
![]() Figure 4: details of an Enigma rotor:
(1) The finger notches used to turn the rotors to a start position. |
These rotors were manufactured with their wirings buried inside and they could not be modified in use.
In the 1930s, the Enigma had only three different kinds of rotor, I II and III. These rotors could be assembled on the shaft in any order giving 6 (i.e. 3x2x1) possible configurations.
In 1938 the Germans added rotors IV and V to the repertoire, thus giving 60 (i.e. 5x4x3) configurations by choosing a set of three rotors from the five. Some further wheels were brought into use during the course of the war but basically the rotors remained unchanged throughout.
You can see the specific substitutions embodied in the wheels on this page.
We are now ready to see the machine actually used by the German armed forces, and to go on to the further complications introduced through the ring-setting and the plugboard or Steckerverbindung.

You can readily see three rotors in place. In operation, a current flowed from right to left then back left to right, so the reflector is at the left and the entry disc is at the right.
The entry disc is a fixed disc of 26 contacts. The keyboard contacts are connected to the right hand side. The left hand side of the entry disc has metal contact discs just like the wheel discs. A curious aspect of the Enigma design was that the keyboard was connected to the entry disc in the simple order ABCDEF... and did not take advantage of the opportunity for introducing a further scrambling.
As explained above, it is important that the rotors are interchangeable. Mechanically, this is effected as follows. When the release lever is pulled forward, the reflector slides to the left and the group of three rotors can be taken out on their shaft. Then the operator can assemble a new sequence of rotors on the shaft, and put this back into the machine.
The lamp panel shows the enciphered output letter for the keyboard key pressed. This was rather a primitive aspect of the Enigma as it relied on the operator to observe and write down the lit-up letter at each stage of encipherment and decipherment.
You can compare its effect with the addition of a further rotor to effect a scrambling both between the keyboard and the entry disc, and between the entry disc and the lamp panel. Unlike the rotors, it could be rewired by the operator. However it was not a rotor — it did not rotate. And furthermore it did not have the full scrambling power of the rotors. It could only effect a 'swapping' of letters, rather as the reflector did. The operator simply inserted plugs so as to connect pairs of letters (generally 10 pairs, in wartime use) and this had the effect of hard-wiring such a swapping.
Because the plugboard affected both the incoming current from the keyboard and the outgoing current to the lamps. it left unchanged the reciprocal property of the Enigma. It also meant that the military Enigma still had the property that no letter could ever be enciphered to itself. This was a very grave mistake in the design.
To see how this worked in more detail, it is best to forget the physical picture of the Enigma and concentrate on a logical diagram of how the electrical current effected substitutions:
![]()
The keyboard was laid out as follows:
Q W E R T Z U I O The same arrangement was used for the lamp panel and the plugboard. |
You can now also see that if the key I had been pressed, the lamp W would have lit up. This is because the path from W to I through the steckers and rotors remains the same, though with the current flowing in the opposite direction.
When the W key is pressed the connection to the W lamp is broken and the I lamp lights. If the I key is now pressed down the connection to the I lamp is broken and the W lamp lights. Here is a more technical description of the plugboard.
This means that the next time a key is pressed, the substitution effected by the rotors is quite different.
At certain points on the rotation of the right hand rotor, the motion is 'carried' to the middle rotor, M which then moves on one letter. Carry will also occur from the middle to the left hand rotor when the carry notch engages, but obviously this will happen much less often.
(A technical note is needed here for the exact simulation of the machine: the Enigma sent the current through the wires AFTER the mechanical linkage had moved the right-hand wheel and any other wheels knocked on by the carry mechanism.)
To appreciate this we must first describe the alphabet RING settings.
The effect of this is that the core which contains the wiring, is turned in relation to the letter showing in the window of the Enigma machine.
At first sight this extra complication might seem rather pointless because it did not change anything to do with the essential scrambling going on inside the system. However the indicator systems, to which we will come later, depended on describing the 'window position' of the rotor, and the ring-setting determined the relationship between the window letters and the actual scramblings. Furthermore, the carry mechanism is affected by the ring setting. The 'carry' point is in fact determined by the position of the carry notch (8) in figure 4, and the crucial point is that this notch is attached to the alphabet RING, and not to the core of the rotor.
The carry notch was arranged to be in a different position for each of the rotors I, II, III, IV, V. This turned out to be a bad cryptographic mistake; it helped first the Poles and then the British analysts at Bletchley Park to identify the right hand rotor in use.
Continue to see the Enigma in military use and the problem facing the cryptanalysts.
|
This page is created by Tony Sale (tsale@qufaro.demon.co.uk) the original curator of the Bletchley Park Museum |
Technical assistance from Andrew Hodges | |